The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World

The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World

  • Downloads:4571
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-08-02 10:20:58
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Adrian Wooldridge
  • ISBN:B09967TC1W
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Meritocracy: the idea that people should be advanced according to their talents rather than their status at birth。 For much of history this was a revolutionary thought, but by the end of the twentieth century it had become the world's ruling ideology。 How did this happen, and why is meritocracy now under attack from both right and left?

Adrian Wooldridge traces the history of meritocracy forged by the politicians and officials who introduced the revolutionary principle of open competition, the psychologists who devised methods for measuring natural mental abilities and the educationalists who built ladders of educational opportunity。 He looks outside western cultures and shows what transformative effects it has had everywhere it has been adopted, especially once women were brought into the meritocractic system。

Wooldridge also shows how meritocracy has now become corrupted and argues that the recent stalling of social mobility is the result of failure to complete the meritocratic revolution。 Rather than abandoning meritocracy, he says, we should call for its renewal。

Download

Reviews

Chris Bradley

A curates egg。 A curates egg, good in parts。 He is a prisoner of his own outlook, when he opines on the motives of people of whom he disapproves he is no more than guessing。Reform of our system is overdue but there are few insights here to help。

Michael O'Reilly

It is my opinion that the author may have written this book whilst at his day job of political editor at the Economist。 This has been mentioned because whilst the topic on the subject of Meritocracy has merit, the author gets distracted and shares his adverse opinion of the former United States President Donald Trump out of context with the subject matter。The author clearly demonstrates a severe case of TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and to circle back to a quote the author has used by Daniel It is my opinion that the author may have written this book whilst at his day job of political editor at the Economist。 This has been mentioned because whilst the topic on the subject of Meritocracy has merit, the author gets distracted and shares his adverse opinion of the former United States President Donald Trump out of context with the subject matter。The author clearly demonstrates a severe case of TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and to circle back to a quote the author has used by Daniel Patrick Moynihan “you’re entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts”。 In particular two incorrect statements “ Trump ignored the advice …。。 and eventually sacked his chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci” and “Trump even suggested that people inject themselves with bleach” (Pge。 345)。Clearly blinded by the author’s antagonism towards Donald Trump included interpretation of the Greek Philosopher Plato’s ‘The Republic’ to warn the world of Donald Trump’s politics and there are additional silly and childish comments too numerous to highlight。The current United President Joe Biden receives favourable treatment and the author is silent on what appears even to the eye of an untrained medical observer the compromised gait and speech pattern of Joe Biden’s dementia。The subject matter of Meritocracy is covered historically but the emphasis is on the education processes including prerequisites and intelligence testing。 The book comments on research of IQ by Professor Lewis Terman but is covered far more comprehensively in Thomas Sowell's ‘Disparities and Prerequisites’。 I would have preferred the author ‘flesh’ out the political dimension including the role of the middle class。The author has conflated the election results of Brexit, Donald Trump and other right wing parties to conclude that there is a movement against Meritocracy as the voting public are turning away from experts。This is a simplistic and lazy intellectual analysis and a convenient way to align Meritocracy with the authors political opinions。 A more considered analysis on experts is available in Thomas Sowell's ‘Intellectuals and Society’。I am a little more optimistic that the voting public are more discerning when it comes to being told how to vote by Celebrity Entertainers and Sportspeople, former Politicians and a coterie of other experts。Finally I hope that Anthony Fauci and the CDC are able to produce a vaccine for the sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome by 2024 for the sake of the author’s health and well being and also my fellow readers of the Economist that we don’t have to suffer through a repeat should Donald Trump decide to seek the Presidency。 。。。more

Ryan Carey

The first three sections how meritocracy was originally a revolutionary idea, that replaced pre-modern systems of nepotism and patronage。 The fourth section describes how meritocracy gained momentum given WW2 and IQ tests。 Then the fifth section analyses threats to meritocracy from elitism (assortative mating, legacy admissions), the left (affirmative action, critical race theory) and the right (populism, rural/urban inequality), and how they can be managed。The level of depth is good, similar to The first three sections how meritocracy was originally a revolutionary idea, that replaced pre-modern systems of nepotism and patronage。 The fourth section describes how meritocracy gained momentum given WW2 and IQ tests。 Then the fifth section analyses threats to meritocracy from elitism (assortative mating, legacy admissions), the left (affirmative action, critical race theory) and the right (populism, rural/urban inequality), and how they can be managed。The level of depth is good, similar to what you would expect from a longer Economist piece, which figures。 Usually key figures from papers are cited, though they're not analysed in great detail。 I've read articles and books on related topics, but I still learned some things, and it helped me to crystallise some insights。 。。。more

Brian Yarwood

Meritocracy to the Privileged Few in 40 YEARS。With the Financial Markets having been rigged and DemocracyHi-jacked and dark wealthy agency working to introduce Autocratic Political Control on the dumb down masses we have interesting times in the near future